Family Attorney
Corzine May Sign Civil Unions Into Law Thursday
|
|
Gov. Jon S. Corzine said he hopes to sign civil unions into law on Thursday, which would give gay couples the same rights as married couples, but is worried that mayors will be able to refuse to conduct the ceremonies. “That would not be equal treatment under the law, but I would like to understand what the rights and obligations are,'’ Corzine said Monday, adding that his lawyers were reviewing the bill. The legislation would make New Jersey one of five states with the most benefits and protections for gay couples, including the right to have health insurance through a partner’s employer. Mayors aren’t required under state law to perform marriages, and the civil unions bill doesn’t alter that discretion. Bogota Mayor Steve Lonegan has said he will not perform the ceremonies and vowed Monday to not back down. “This is the first time in history an American is being told to perform a ritualistic ceremony no matter what you believe in,'’ Lonegan said. “I’m not doing it. I’m daring them to make me do it.'’ The Legislature approved civil unions Thursday in response to a state Supreme Court order that gay couples be granted the same rights as married couples. In the October ruling, the court gave lawmakers six months to act and left it to them to decide whether to call the gay unions “marriage'’ or something else. Stephen Hyland, a Princeton lawyer with expertise in marriage law, said mayors who perform marriage ceremonies for heterosexual couples but refuse ceremonies for gay couples won’t violate the civil union law but may violate anti-discrimination laws. “It would not be equal treatment,'’ Hyland said. “Mayors have a right to conduct wedding ceremonies or not to conduct them, but I think to say we’re only going to conduct certain types of ceremonies opens the door pretty widely. It does raise discrimination questions.'’ If Corzine signs the bill Thursday as he hopes, the law would become effective Feb. 19. Couples would face a three-day waiting period before they can register their unions. The governor said he wasn’t sure what action he would take if his lawyers tell him the legislation allows mayors to reject civil union requests. Corzine could conditionally veto the bill, under which it would be sent back to lawmakers for revision. Or, he could sign it and hope lawmakers amend it. Steven Goldstein, chairman of gay rights group Garden State Equality, praised Corzine for considering the issue. He contended that, had lawmakers called the unions “marriages'’ in the legislation, there would be no question over whether mayors could balk. Bill Dressel, executive director of the New Jersey League of Municipalities, said the organization that represents mayors and municipal officials was reviewing the bill. He said his group is looking into what penalties mayors might face if they refuse to perform civil unions. “We have asked our attorneys to look into it,'’ Dressel said. “But nothing will be definitive until the governor signs the bill into law.'’ In the United States, only Massachusetts allows gay couples to marry. Vermont and Connecticut have civil unions, and California offers domestic partnerships that have all the rights and responsibilities of marriage. Since 2004, New Jersey has had a more limited version of domestic partnerships. Among the benefits to be conferred on gay couples under New Jersey’s civil unions bill are adoption rights, hospital visitation rights and inheritance rights. More : 1010wins.com |
Related Articles from Attorney for Family
N.H. House Passes Civil Union Bill
New Hampshire moved closer Wednesday to joining neighboring Vermont and a handful of other states in approving civil unions for same-sex couples. The House voted 243-129 to give same-sex couples the same rights, responsibilities, and obligations as married couples. Same-sex unions from other states would be recognized if they were legal in the state where they were performed. More : abcnews.go.com
From time to time, the journalist Andrew Sullivan makes the argument that the establishment of gay marriage
* From time to time, the journalist Andrew Sullivan makes the argument that the establishment of gay marriage, for which he is a prominent polemicist, is the only way of preventing a proliferation of marriage-lite alternatives such as civil unions and domestic partnerships. In a recent squib, he wrote that National Review is so hostile to gay marriage that we, "bizarrely," favor the creation of "new and more elaborate marriage-lite options for gays and straights." That would be bizarre, if true. Let us clarify our position. We favor a constitutional amendment as the only means to prevent federal and state
Opponents of marriage proposition widen fight.
Aug. 15--Opponents have vowed to enlist community support to fight a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage as well as benefits for domestic partners in Arizona. A Monday call for volunteers to telephone and e-mail others for support followed a Thursday decision by a Maricopa County Superior Court judge that Proposition 107 does not violate the state's single-subject amendment rule and can appear on the November ballot. Ken Clark, campaign director of the Arizona Together campaign, said in the next two weeks a volunteer force of "thousands" will mobilize against the proposed amendment as new coalition members enlist
Post’s Knight misled on same-sex marriage court cases
In his August 30 Denver Post column criticizing a domestic partnership measure that will appear on the November ballot, Al Knight misleadingly asserted that "[s]tates that have recently succeeded in defending bans on same-sex marriage also bar domestic partnerships and civil unions." It is true that two states -- Georgia (on July 6) and Nebraska (on July 14) -- recently succeeded in defending legal challenges to state constitutional amendments banning both same-sex marriage and alternatives such as domestic partnerships and civil unions. However, contrary to Knight's assertion, at least one state -- Connecticut (on July 12) -- recently succeeded in
Don’t accept civil unions
SINCE I STARTED at the Human Rights Campaign, I have had the opportunity to talk with gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people nationwide about the path to equality. Foremost in the minds of many I have been honored to meet is this question: Why is marriage so important? If you’re wondering this, you’re not alone. According to a Harris Interactive poll we recently commissioned, half of all GLBT adults think civil unions are the same as marriage. Unfortunately, that’s just not true. Simply put, civil unions do not provide any of the more than 1,000 protections or securities afforded under