Family Attorney Attorneys Directory Cities we Work in States We work in Contact Us  

Family Attorney

Courts Expand the Rights of Unmarried Fathers


The courts, which have been granting more parental rights to fathers, are expanding their definition of paternity to include unmarried fathers who have traditionally been locked out of their children’s upbringing.

The courts, which have been granting more parental rights to fathers, are expanding their definition of paternity to include unmarried fathers who have traditionally been locked out of their children’s upbringing.

In an era of rapid changes in family law, courts have shown concern that laws denying parental rights to unwed fathers may be unconstitutional if they discriminate on the basis of marital status.

In the process, assumptions about the legal definition of fatherhood have begun to crumble. In several states judges have found ways to skirt the ancient legal presumption, enshrined in state laws, that a woman’s husband is the father of her child. Taboo Is Weakening

But unwed fathers who want to take responsibility for their children still stand on shaky legal ground. In almost all states laws setting forth the rights of parents have no provisions for unmarried couples, so fathers of illegitimate children must go to court armed with blood tests or other evidence of paternity to gain parental rights. In California unmarried an father is not even entitled to a hearing to establish his paternity. The Supreme Court has highlighted the issue this session by agreeing to hear two cases in which unwed California men are seeking visitation and custody of their children.

Experts on family law say the weakening of illegitimacy as a social taboo has prompted lawmakers and judges in lower courts to grant new rights to unwed fathers. In part this trend is part of a larger movement toward giving ‘’legitimate'’ fathers broader rights to custody, visiting, naming and passing on inheritances. But the experts say that two double standards still prevail: women have more parental rights than men and married men have more parental rights than unmarried men.

‘’There is no state in the nation that would deprive an unwed mother of her child, but a lot of states still deprive the unwed father,'’ said Ronald K. Henry, a lawyer in Washington. ‘’An unwed father is often treated as a constitutional stranger to his children simply because of his marital status.'’ Wisconsin Breaks Ground

State laws require biological fathers who are called upon to pay child support to do so whether they are married to the mother or not. Advocates for legal reform argue that the law should compensate fathers for this responsibility by offering them more ready access to custody and other child care privileges.

This summer Wisconsin passed a groundbreaking law that permits unwed fathers who sign affidavits of paternity to assume parental rights for their children.

‘’This law is based on the notion that most men, if the opportunity were there, would voluntarily place their name on the affidavit,'’ said Thomas Loftus, speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly, who is the author of the legislation. ‘’The law is designed to give every child in Wisconsin the legal right to a father.'’

Such a law would have helped settle a dispute that arose this fall in Providence, R.I., where the mother of a 2-year-old girl was denied a birth certificate because she refused to give the child her estranged husband’s surname. The mother, Betty Virella, and the girl’s biological father, James Aponte, both wanted to give their daughter Mr. Aponte’s last name, but the state would not issue such a birth certificate because Ms. Virella is legally married to someone else. The state agreed earlier this month to issue the birth certificate, although it did not recognize Mr. Aponte as the father. ‘A Step or Two Behind’

State officials argue that they may regulate the selection of a child surname for purposes of keeping records of vital statistics, preventing fraud and promoting marriage and family life. Opponents of such regulations call these arguments outdated and say that computers have created ways to keep track of people without reliance on paternal surnames.

More : query.nytimes.com

Related Articles from Attorney for Family

Fathers stage court protest

Campaigners calling for fathers to be given better contact rights with their children have staged a protest inside a London court. About 50 members of the Fathers 4 Justice group, which includes men and women, stormed Court One of the Family Division of the High Court in the Strand. Courts sessions were suspended as police removed demonstrators but there were no arrests. Friday's protest is the latest in a series of demonstrations by the group, which claims fathers have been unable to publicise alleged miscarriages of justice because of a "conspiracy of silence in the Family Court". A spokeswoman for

Family law shake-up call to MPs

The Solicitors Family Law Association (SFLA) said there should be a statutory presumption the child should have contact with both parents. This would reinforce the idea contact was not a "gift" one parent made to another, an MPs' committee heard. The association was giving evidence to an inquiry into the family courts. MPs on the constitutional affairs committee heard that although there was no deliberate attempt to discriminate against fathers, the way the courts worked meant that fathers often lost out. Children usually stay in the family home with the mother during a break-up and even if the father later

Fathers group wants transcripts taken in family law cases

The Unmarried and Separated Fathers of Ireland group has called for a record to be kept of all family law cases, either by stenographer or audio recording. The call comes as the Government introduces new regulations easing the 'in camera' rule that restricts the people allowed to attend hearings like divorce and child custody cases. At present, only those directly connected to the case can attend, but the new rules will allow people like family mediators and researchers to also be present. The move follows concerns that the existing 'in camera' rule had prevented public debate about family law cases. However, the Unmarried and

New family law reforms proposed

Ministers want to reduce the waiting time for an uncontested divorce from two years to one and in contested cases from five years to two years. Co-habiting couples who split up will be able to go to court if there is disagreement over dividing the assets. Unmarried fathers who register the birth of their child with the mother would be given full parental rights. Family support At the moment, only the mother has such rights, even if the father's name is on the child's birth certificate. Justice Minister Cathy Jamieson said there were about 200,000 unmarried couples living together with

Family law reforms moving closer

The legislation will proceed to Stage Two after being endorsed by 86 votes in favour, with four MSPs voting against, while 23 abstained. Reform of the Family Law (Scotland) Bill could see unmarried fathers and gay couples being given more rights. Deputy Justice Minister Hugh Henry said the Scottish Executive was not afraid of tackling the difficulties of reform. The time for obtaining an uncontested divorce is to be reduced from two years to one. Reforms will also include reducing the separation period for divorce without consent from five years to two. The bill will bring in legal safeguards for cohabiting



Contact us by filling up the form.

Name*

Post Code*

Tel Number *

Email *

Details You want to give to us.

Our Attorney Network
Accident Admiralty Adoption Arbitration Asbestos Bankruptcy
Business Child Civil Consumer Criminal Discrimination
Divorce Drug Dui Dwi Estate Planning Family
Federal Immigration Injury Insurance Juvenile Labor
Lemon Law Litigation Maritime
Medical Malpractice Mesothelioma Personal Injury
Real Estate Sex Crimes Sexual Harassment Tax Traffic Wrongful Death
About Us : Disclaimer : Privacy Policy : Feedback Form : Contact Us
© Family Attorneys Powered by: USA Attorney Network