Family Attorney
Dueling memos: Dems accuse each other of exaggerations
|
|
The war of words on the Democratic presidential candidate is the schuldiger exaggerating his record. The campaigns of Bill Clinton and Obama have now all bets memos to “interested parties", where the other candidates is found guilty, decorate. The campaign for the Clinton version can be found here. Under this it raises Senator Barack Obama: • “gross exaggeration its role on the reform of immigration and housing policy.” • The use of credit lines for the “disclosure of Nuclear Leak, who never of the commission.” The campaign Obama version can be found here. Under this it raises Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton: • Overstating their role in the creation of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. • Exaggerating part of their passage in the family and Medical Leave Act. Obama The memo also states that no one who is entitled to surprise Bill Clinton was forced to take advantage of their aircraft waiting vehicles in Bosnia during 1996 because of the threat posed by the fire of snipers – a requirement that proved false, and that it sees as anomalies. Update 1:35 pm ET. A response to the Clinton Obama Memo: “The campaign Obama full attack on Hillary is expanding at an affront to the full truth,” Clinton’s campaign, writes on its website sheets race. “Note of the Obama campaign is now totally liberated flagrante misinformation and false allusion to disparage Hillary’s critical role in the passage of SCHIP and the Family and Medical Leave Act. Of course, they believe that the media have on the facts and not others follow correctly, Triviale story of their birth. ” |
Related Articles from Attorney for Family
MEMOS
College of Charleston's procurement director, Wendy E. Williams, has earned the designations of certified public purchasing officer through the Universal Public Purchasing Certification Council and certified purchasing manager through the Institute for Supply Management. Gulf Stream Construction Co. Inc. recently completed its Hungry Neck Boulevard project. The $4.9 million, 1.75-mile road begins at the corner of U.S. 17... Source : accessmylibrary.com
Dueling Senators
Your April 26 front-page article on the feud between Senators Frank R. Lautenberg and Robert G. Torricelli of New Jersey reminded me of the couples I work with as a divorce mediator. I try to encourage them to concentrate on the goals they have in common, like putting the best interest of their children before their own needs. Senator Lautenberg and Senator Torricelli should do the same: put aside pettiness, competition for power and their egos and concentrate on the interests of the people who elected them, the principles of the Democratic Party that they are both committed to, and
Congress Should Kill Discriminatory Domestic Violence Act
The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) will expire this September if it is not reauthorized by Congress. Largely viewed as an anti-domestic violence measure, VAWA has become a flashpoint for the men's rights advocates who see it instead as the living symbol of anti-male bias in law. Although a significant number of domestic violence victims are male, VAWA defines victims as female. As one result, tax-funded domestic violence shelters and services assist women and routinely turn away men, often including older male children. Estimates vary on the prevalence of male victims. Professor Martin Fiebert of California State University at Long Beach offers
Divorce and Ruination
The divorce industry is growing, as your April 4 news article ''A New Kind of Detective for the Longer Goodbye'' suggests. But it is a cancerous growth that is spreading beyond the very rich and, for some middle-class couples, consuming the marital estate. As a divorce lawyer, I can testify to the major role that our laws and courts play in this egregious waste. Our adversarial system not only enables but also mandates dueling lawyers and experts to drain family money from the futures of embattled couples and innocent children. Complicated financial and psychological issues should not be resolved by
How to Reduce Some of the Trauma of Divorce
Divorce Lawyers Assailed in Study," your May 5 article on the report of a committee appointed by New York State's highest court, raises an important question. Why are most people in a matrimonial dispute doomed to be mired in an obsolete system that ill serves their needs so much of the time? There is no disagreement that the divorce experience is a major trauma in the lives of the couple and their children. Reliance on the adversarial system for relief comes to us from the Judeo-Christian and English Common Law tradition that marriage is indissoluble except for exceptional, grievous circumstances.