Family Attorney

National partners employees of the State of Arizona, is homosexual or obliquely, health coverage and services under a new plan approved Tuesday by the Governor’s Regulatory Review. The three members abstaining or missing, the group agreed to allow 4-0 benefits of enlargement. Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano has pushed the plan at the forefront of the debate over the past year.

Whether it will be renewed or non-governmental, national partner benefits is a very controversial issue. Those who oppose homosexuality, gay marriage and / or some form of legalized domestic partnerships against the extension of little medical care or other benefits to gay partners of government workers.

On the reverse, homosexuals are well represented in the government - even if nobody asks, and nobody said. As such, she and others support gay rights agenda, including gay marriage and recognition of domestic partnerships, believe that gay partner deserve the same benefits by the spouse, bureaucrats right .

One of the benefits for members of the military and military Congress on fact-finding missions includes a free space - if one is empty - on military flights. But this provision has been very taunting in the last days.

After policies, the cavity before Easter, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was forced to intervene, Defence Minister Robert Gates, to Democratic Rep. Tammy Baldwin’s national partners on a military flight to a conference-Fact-Finding Trip to the Europe. ”

Since Baldwin’s home state of Wisconsin not officially recognized, same-sex marriages, military units and officials were not willing to discuss their partners a “marriage", while the two women exchanged their wedding vows.

It is rare for positions of public expenditure to such an influence on the federal government, as members of Congress a partner would be prohibited by a military aircraft. The scenario magic alive, Hollywood-esk image of a woman on the basis of officials in uniform, while her lover is promoted in foreign countries. There also appears to be a throwback to the days of segregation transportation, among blacks do not enjoy the same rights as whites.

Pragmatic view, marriage is a social contract honoured by the State. That’s why we need to as much paperwork. If there is only a spiritual event, a religious who would need to preside over the ceremony. It seems quite logical that this type of contract must be determined for each individual. In no other case - with the exception of minors - an individual can be excluded from entering into an agreement with another. So why is it fair to exclude subscription Gays marriage with the other?

It is not fair, but some concerns that the “sanctity of marriage” would be ruined by the State should be tolerant of homosexuality. Well, the sanctity of marriage is already ruined half of the time when 50% of marriages ending in divorce. In addition, those who get married for green cards, money, fame, out of fear or as part of a reality television show - yes, unfortunately, I have been subjected to the license - even chip on the sanctity of marriage in this perspective. Let us say that the marriage of a beautiful thing, if this does not work, but with chalk or an ideal standard beyond what it is: a contractual commitment between the two to oblige PEOPLE their love and loyalty to another.

Arizona Janet Napolitano Governor’s Regulatory Review Council agreed unanimously to grant benefits to domestic partners of state employees. Critics said that the benefits of the new rule revisions, the institution of marriage. Gays and lesbians partners welcomed the measure. Marriages between persons of the same opinion about later, some people react negatively to messages purely budgetary. The Governor’s Office says that the costs for national partners would offer advantages, of course, the fact that Arizona would be more competitive in the production and retention of the best talent.

This means that the new directive as from 1 October 2008 employees in the provision that the State families may opt for medical, dental and other benefit coverage options. National partners of qualification. It is estimated that fewer than 1000 employees work for the state of Arizona would be affected by the rule. Although some workers of the state domestic partnerships in other Member States have already taken such benefits, to less than half of the United States were at the moment.

So it is a fact much? I expect that the litigation to overturn decision is imminent. Time will tell.

Integrated Management Information, Inc. (IMI Global) (OTCBB: INMG), a leading supplier of test instruments and Internet solutions for agriculture / livestock, industry, announced today that it has signed an agreement, the exclusive distributors of global brand “Do ® & Born in the USA” label. The agreement defines IMI Global in a strong position to move the industry to mandatory labeling of all meat products in the identification of the country of origin. There are 87 billion pounds of meat produced in the United States each year.

In view of the 2002 Farm Bill, retailers in Germany must appear on the packaging label for determining the country of origin (COOL) for meat products, including cattle, pork, lamb and fish, beginning in the fall of 2008. The Born & Raised ® in the USA label at the moment on a voluntary basis, and not on the selected products offers retailers, manufacturers and processors is streamlined and good third revision of the programme as through support and promotion of meat products Inländischen.

“The deadline for national retailers begin ads labeling of the country of origin closer quickly, this agreement is a timely and perhaps one of the most important global partnerships IMI has been a part,” said John Saunders , President and CEO of IMI Global. “We believe the Born & Raised ® in the United States-Label, IMI’s third verification systems, to find wide acceptance by the National Packer and retailers who are under the mandate of the beginning of the end of this year . mark, which Shown a prominent American Flag, is a visual assessment convincingly that we feel we appeal to packers and retailers to take over, by giving consumers an easy and visible to identify the label d a product exclusively born, raised and the United States. IMI Global Is a national standard setting in the third - and verification services, we have a confirmation of food systems since 1995, production for sale Retail and retailers have developed more than 60% of all USDA PVP and QSA programs in the United States. As a result, we are well positioned for this label to promote respect COOL Both for our customers. Our goal is Born & Raised ® in the United States, the industry standard. ”

Saunders, “said Born & Raised ® in the USA label program has been developed over seven years by Carolyn Carey, founder and president of Born & Raised ® in the United States, the industry has seen the holding of the leadership and remained for several years before labelling of the country of origin had become a reality.

Carey added that IMI Global was an obvious choice as a partner for exclusive marketing. “IMI Global is highly respected confirmation to the organization with a full range of experience, a chip Bluetooth and a strong customer track record in working with the USDA,” she said. “We are excited about the possibility of roll-out Born & Raised ® in the United States for retail and packers of Germany and give them a solution COOL easily achieved at no additional cost to the cow-calf producers .

A long-standing customer of Born & Raised in the United States, Western Grasslands ®, Inc. dba Panorama Meats, Inc. www.PanoramaMeats.com, producers of Panorama Natural Grass-Fed Beef ™ and Panorama Organic Grass-Fed Beef ( TM). Based in Vina, California, markets Panorama grass-natural and organic beef on nutrition and diet and natural traditional operators, retail trade of foodstuffs, such as Whole Foods and Trader Joe United States .

About IMI Global

Founded in 1995, IMI Global is a leading supplier of test and Internet solutions for agriculture. Go to www.IMIGlobal.com for more information. IMI has partnered with some of the largest farm organizations in the United States, providing applications based on the web for verification and identification, as well as a wide range of consulting services tailored to the needs of each client. IMI belong www.CattleNetwork.com operations, an online service of the supply market and industry news, information on the cattle www.CattleStore.com and Industry, an online source for fed animals, as animal identification, medical equipment and veterinary supplied. IMI additional websites containing www.USVerified.com, and www.AgNetwork.com www.PetSupplyVerified.com.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

This press release contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, based on current forecasts, estimates and forecasts at risk. Statements statements that are, by nature, uncertain, and actual events could materially from forecasts of the company. Key factors that lead to real events that vary from the estimates include, in particular, in our SEC. In particular, statements in this release of Press on growth, profitability, potential, leadership, impact and effectiveness of the company’s products and services on the market, and prospects for Born & Raised ® in America program labelling are forward-looking, sub-residence of a large number of factors, including the availability of funds, personnel and other resources, competition, state regulation of the industry for beef on the market for beef and other factors to be taken into account. Furthermore, the financial results for the three and nine months are not necessarily indicative of future results. Readers should not be unduly on these forward-looking statements. The company disclaims any obligation to update its forward-looking statements light of new information or adapt to the changes. For a more detailed discussion of the Corporation’s business, please contact the SEC at www.sec.gov society.

The Governor’s Regulatory Tuesday, the Council approved a measure, by the hands of Gov. Janet Napolitano to extend benefits to the government and workers, public institutions of higher education are part of domestic demand unmarried partnerships.

The move is to allow unmarried couples, including same-sex partners who meet certain criteria in order to protect human health and the same benefits as married couples. Members of unqualified couples would also in the plan.

Napolitano Behind men, and others say it’s just for the extension of benefits. Equal rights for homosexuals Arizona group said Tuesday that many companies, states and universities offer such benefits.

The conservative Republicans against the draft say that married workers should be able, benefits for spouses and their children. The question of whether the Governor may not, without the approval of the legislative changes. There are legislative proposals in view of the action, scheduled for October to come into force.

The state law prohibits same-sex marriages.

(Luxembourg), based in Luxembourg, the European Court of Justice Tuesday, that if a company provides pension benefits for married partners of employees must be the same as benefits for same-sex partners.

The case concerned Tadao Maruko, a German of 65, who, when he pleaded for marriage benefits from the company her husband had worked.

The management of pension funds said that, because the couple was not married was Maruko could not be taken into account.

For three years, fought Maruko the case. He lost in a German court and the right to the procedure of the Tribunal referred the case to court to demand of the Union of Judges, in order to determine whether domestic partnerships should be at par with marriage and as pension funds discrimination occurred.

Germany can to certain rights for same-sex couples, but does not have a civil marriage or partnerships.

“The refusal of granting the survivor’s pension for life of a direct partner from discrimination based on sexual orientation, if the surviving spouses and surviving spouses are in a comparable situation with regard to retirement, Tuesday,’’said the judge in his written decision.

Decision by Germany provides judges in the case to determine the status of the pension.

The decision is also a benchmark for companies and governments across the European Union to offer recognition of all same-sex couples ..

The International Lesbian and Gay Association - Europe argue the case in court.

“We welcome today’s decision by the European Court of Justice, as well as its strong wording clearly indicates that the refusal to grant a pension to a surviving partner in the life of the immediate orientation discrimination Sexual “and therefore can not be justified in each circumstance,” says Patricia Prendiville, Executive Director of ILGA-Europe.

Prediville But at the same time that the ILGA-Europe is concerned about the fact that the decision has no direct legal consequences same-sex partners in the European Union countries, which do not recognize yet, the lives of gay communities.

“This creates a two-class discrimination in the level of protection of lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender citizens of the EU, which are divided into two categories, as is their access to survivors’ pension rights depends on their country of residence . ”

Opponents of the national production of Oregon voters want partnerships repealing a law passed in 2007 establishing rights for lesbians and gay couples.

State Rep. Sal Esquivel, R-Medford, state Senator Gary George, R-McMinnville, and former Senator Marilyn Shannon Brooks initiative of the petition filed by 146 on Monday, Oregon Secretary of State Bill Bradbury. It aims at the elimination House Bill 2007, the Equity Act family, and rightly so, January 1st

The petition seeks 82,769 signatures to qualify for the Nov. 4 ballot.

The Secretary of State is the adoption, if the process input on the initiative of constitutional errors, needs signatures to put into circulation. The deadline for comments is April 22.

The initiative proposes that domestic partnerships not to grant any individual, the privileges, immunities, rights and benefits of the Marriage Act of individuals. In addition, provides that any liability, the law on the person who is or has been married Do not be imposed on the person or domestic partnership. ”

The family of fairness is a controversial law two bills, the gay and lesbian Oregonians law was that, in this year. The other, Oregon Equality Act, which prohibits discrimination in the workplace and in housing and public accommodations.

Initiative 146 is the latest attempt, asking voters to overturn the new laws.

Initiative 144 domestic partnership repeal of the legislation, was arrested on February 29.

Initiative 145, the abolition of Oregon Equality Act, and was signed on March 3.

None of the measures proposed ballots have been certified.

EON Capital Bhd is it just a strategic tie-ups with a large bank in China, and another in the Middle East in the second half of this year, to ensure consistency with the platforms, press on the fast-growing markets.

The entrance of Primus Pacific as a strategic partner of the investor capital EON early February is a boost for banks of the group to strengthen its presence in the local market, but also Malaysia on reports on partnerships.

“The second half of the year is a very exciting period for EON Capital,” Primus manager Ng Wing-Fai said, adding that negotiations should begin in the coming months and the two partners would have to type EON Capital You in the world’s two largest sources of capital - in the Middle East and China.

“We want to put online interconnection between Malaysia and investors in the Middle East. We can finance a variety of projects with investors from the Middle East and China, “he said.

Ng is optimistic about the prospects for EON Capital tie-ups, adding: “We have asked our partners Islamic Banking and China, with a division of the Chinese mainland banks. It is only from the outside and not the domestic market or the front. ”

However, he explained, the tie-ups that did not participate in a sale, as “we do not want a change in the structure of participation EON Capital for some time.”

According to Ng, many banks in the Middle East and China, had proposed to cooperation with the EON Capital since Primus announced that they had purchased a stake of 20.2% in EON Capital RM1.337bil or for a In part RM9.55 DRB-HICOM Bhd unit HICOM Holdings Bhd early February.

Ng sees great potential for the EON Capital Bank Islamic Affairs and expected to grow by 25% by the Islamic Bank of fortune each year for the bank, for the future, vis-à-vis de l’industrie 15 %.

On the China department of the Bank, said Ng, that promote Malaysia and China-commerce. It allows the bank for corporate financing of trade and investment flows, financing by the Malaysian company to invest in China and vice-versa.

Another component is the property of the bank financing can be carried over to Chinese investors, including 100 to 200 million middle class who, under the Malaysia My Second Home Systems.

On the home front, “said Ng EON Capital invests US $ 200mil would be in the next 12 to 18 months in the investment bank.

“We, the heavy investment in retail banking,” he said, adding that investment in the renovation would be branches, including internal computer skills for the recruitment and training of people and centralization of some of its operations .

“The change of the franchise-EON Capital is on the right track. There will be many changes in the street or on the basis from now on.

“We will see an impact bottom line in this exercise as well. However, it will be within the next year of primary importance,” he said.

EON Bank Group Chief Executive Officer, Albert Lau says, have a strong and capable management team on the bench.

The banks in the group, the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer, in two weeks. A new Chief Operating Officer, is also expected on board soon.

Ng said the Bank’s internal growth would be the bank’s retail banking and SME-Islamic Banking.

The icing on the cake, the group of strategic tie-ups with the Near and Middle East and Chinese partners.

“We are convinced that a bank of our size, openness and capacities should be a return of the return on equity (ROE) of 15% at 18 to 24 months of our current 6% to 7%.

“This is why we are investing a lot of money in our business. We want a good bank, so that the return on equity can be achieved and sustained,” he said.

EON is predictable Ng-Capital Regional jump on the train expansion by acquiring banks overseas?

“This will be our next phase of growth - perhaps the end of next year. I have a long list of banks in China to EON Capital to buy. There is no rush, “he said.

A 9 / 11 on the health of survivors’ benefits by its offer of domestic partnership. Then there was a transfer of Idaho - and a loss of health to preserve.

Thus, 365Gay.com reported in a story published on March 24

Robert Ryan, has been published in the insurance industry licensing of Morgan Stanley with an office in the south tower of the WTC,. On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, Ryan was in the workplace, office, which focuses on the 74th floor of the building, when the northern part of the tour was American Airlines, Flight 11

Given that the people of the south tower of the building fled, United Flight 175 plowed into the structure. Ryan, who is still in the building, were trampled underfoot during the panic.

Although the building before collapsing, Ryan’s injuries and psychological trauma, he made it necessary for a disability for a year. Meanwhile, he has savings, it would be at his retirement.

Ryan and Ralph Martinelli met in 2004 and was chosen as the national partner in the State of New Jersey in 2005. At this point, Ryan’s medical costs were Konica Minolta, preserve health.

The couple moved to give Ryan ID a change of scenery and enable it to escape reminders every day the days following the attacks. But his physical and psychological wounds have insisted, and they are costly to treat.

But since ID law, on the contrary, quite rightly, NJ, not for lesbians and gay families, the mechanisms for such protection, the company fired Ryan to preserve health.

365Gay.com reported that Konica Minolta said that his policy of national coverage through their health insurance if their employees live in countries where local partnerships can be registered, or in which the equality of marriage is available to all World Faire.

At present, MA are just full equality of marriage. Only six states and the District of Columbia National Partnership for residents. The United States are among CA, HI, ME, NJ, OR and WA.

ID offers no protection for GLBT families or individuals, but last January, there have been some movements in the prior establishment of the Government of GLBT including anti-discrimination legislation, that it is The link points to EDGE.

Indeed, in 2006, was approved an article voters of the nation, most restrictive bans the family gay, lesbian recognition.

Medical expenses for the purposes of Ryan, could mean that the 9 / 11 so that the survivors to live without treatment.

The couple do not think the law. 365Gay.com Martinelli The article quotes the words: “I am always at the same company doing the same job. Why should I am not able to take my partner in Idaho, as I have in New Jersey? ”

David, a friend of Nicky, my beautiful laatlammetjie asked me to lunch the other day.

Given that we are placed in the restaurant of Melrose Arch, it kleinlaut smiled and said: “I expect you to know what it is.”

“No, no, not even,” I told myself that all innocence.

“Now, I ask you to Nicky’s hand in marriage.”

The young ladies Nicky has loved since his schooling eight years ago. I gave him my blessing quickly.

It is a kind of thin and erect Nicky has eyes for him. In addition, newly its last review captain, he has time. It is also great to 2 meters, weighs 120 kilograms and is playing for the first team Wits barrier - “kinda wide at the shoulder and narrow at the hip and not everyone knows you, not too big lip Dave!”

We look forward to every day, when David Nicky and do what our two daughters were older - walk down the red carpet on the lawn velvet our family in the country of origin Natal Drakensberg - and the solemn vows in the eyes of God and 150 friends and parents.

We are in the order of significance of the feather of pious men in the 17th century. The couple is drawn to the fact that marriage, “an honourable properties, which are not unberaten, mild or deliberate, men’s growing appetite carnal tastes and brutal, as animals do not understand, but impressive, discreet, intentionally, and the sobriety Fear of God “.

They undertake to consult each other, “and to keep to this day forward, for better for worse, for richer, for poorer, in the event of sickness and in health, to love and estimate till death do us part. “They still give their meagre wordly goods on the other.

Yes, and Nicky has faith in David’s bona fides, they have nothing against companies to “obey” her husband bribes. He is very happy with the idea that it is sympathetic to head home.

We, the witnesses during their parole. We expect that it is faithful to the end, for the marriage of any attempt, distress or argument. We expect it - even for their children. We expect that they love to opfernde until they are old and fragile.

The other two were married for 12 years and eight, and have lived up to their promises. They are now strong and happy families. It was (with exceptions sorry), and hundreds of years until recently. The great civilizations were built for the same deny that the concept of family.

With all this in the background, I picked up at random from the SA Law Reform Commission entitled “Report on Domestic Partnerships", 500 pages, the discussion paper on a new marriage, except with the permission of SA.

Y-, Off-N, E-Excused, NV non-voting

Election of the President of the United States of America

ASS 5628 creates an intergovernmental agreement on the election of the President of the United States. Currently, the chairman of the Central Election Commission of the college of electors in each state. Applicants must be between 270 and 538 votes to win elections, the presidency. SSB 5628, the promise of Washington’s 11 votes for the election of the winners of the national referendum, in contrast to the winners of Washington’s people. However, this measure would only be effective if enough countries in possession of a majority vote of the elections to the same extent. The intergovernmental agreement, the winner of the popular vote on the next president of the Electoral Commission effectively circumvent College. ASS 5628 passed by the Senate by a vote of 30 to 18 and is now before Parliament as a result of treatment.

Senator Bob Morton N

Senator Linda Evans Parlette N

Senator Janéa Holmquist N

National Campaign to the tolling system in politics

The house of E2SHB 1773 by a vote of 59 to 35, with the introduction of tolls federal state. The Washington Transportation Commission that the system of toll authority, it must be considered that the following guidelines for the introduction of electronic toll: a total of leadership, whether the use of tolls, the use of toll revenues , bringing the toll rates and the length of collecting tolls. The Commission must make a report to the legislature, an annual report on the implementation of these measures. The bill also authorizes the toll revenues to cover operating costs, payment of debts, intended for the transport of people and goods, and other improvements at the plant, where tolls charged. E2SHB 1773 is now before the Senate Transportation Committee.

Rep. Joel Kretz

N R-Wauconda

Rep. Bob Sump

N R-Republic

Rep. Mike Armstrong

N R-Wenatchee

Rep. Cary Condotta

N R-Wenatchee

Rep. Judy Warnick

N R-Moses Lake

Giving the tribal police authority

EHB 2476, Parliament adopted a vote of 58 to 37, the authorization of tribal police general of the authority of peace officers in Washington State. It would be a tribal law officers for the implementation of laws of the State of strain countries provided they are recognized by a tribe at the federal level and have insurance and the requirements of continuing education by the State . Courses notice or crime, are necessary to put on local jurisdictions, within three days for the local application. EHB 2476 is now before the Senate Judiciary Committee for further treatment.

AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security

OFFICE ADDRESS: Department of Homeland Security, United States Coast Guard (USCG), Commanding Officer, USCG Aircraft Repair & Supply Center, HU25, HH65, H60J, C130, ESD, 130J EC support PIO or ALD, Elizabeth City, NC, 27909 – 5001, UNITED STATES

THEME: 16 - Helicopter Integrated Data Storage System (HIDS)

CLASSIFICATION CODE: 16 - Aircraft components and accessories

SOLICITATION NUMBER: HSCG38-08-R-200002

CONTACT: Tabitha Bakely, HH65 Contract Specialist, telephone 252-335-6141, fax 252-334-5240, e-mail Tabitha.L.Bakely @ uscg.mil - Claudette Surrento, HH65 Contract Specialist, tel 252-335 - 6644, Fax 252 -334-5240, e-mail@Claudette.Y.Surrento uscg.mil

NOTE TEXT: Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard (USCG) Commanding Officer, USCG Aircraft Repair & Supply Center, this is a combined synopsis / call concerning industrial property, in accordance with the format in FAR part 12 to 15 , supplemented by additional information in this publication. This announcement is only a call for proposals, and are invited to a written request will not be spent. Solicitation Number HSCG38-08-R-200002 is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP). This request document and the arrangements and the terms are, in effect, by the Federal Acquisition bulletin 2005-23. The current rules North American Industry Classification Standard Code 336413rd Small businesses standard size of 1000 employees. It is an invitation without restriction. The U.S. Coast Guard Aircraft Repair & Supply Center (ARSC) is seeking proposals for a company at a fixed price for an indefinite period Delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) Helicopter Intergraded Data Storage Systems (HIDS), and care for a one-year term and a four - Option periods of the year. Parents appeal documents such as specifications, performance specifications, instructions to the Offerors, structure and elements of line, please visit the website at ARSC Contracting http://www.uscg.mil/ hq/arsc/contracting/HH65/HH-65. Htm # HH65_Solicitations Closing date and time for receipt of tenders is set for April 30, 2008, 3:00 EST. All responsible sources may submit an offer, then by the Agency. Award is the most anticipated for the 30 or May 2008. Contact Tabitha Bakely on Tabitha.L.Bakely @ uscg.mil or Claudette Surrento@uscg.mil Claudette.Y.Surento on matters pertaining to this call. The proposals are adopted at the following address: USCG HH-65 ARSC Bldg 78 Attn: Tabitha Bakely Elizabeth City, NC 27909 FAR The following provisions and clauses of this request and the availability of reference are: Clauses 52,252 -2 Incorporated by Reference (FEB 1998). The invitation contains one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if it was in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will present its full text at your disposal. The full text of the clause, Internet access to the email www.deskbook.Osd.Mil. 52212-1 instructions to Offerors Commercial Items (NOV 2007) 52212-2 Evaluation Commercial Items “(January 1999), the evaluation criteria are technology, experience, application delivery and performance of businesses in the past. Technical features is a little more important than experience. Experience Slightly larger than the demand for delivery. call delivery is a little more important than the performance of companies in the past. The price is not weighted, but before the award. Plus you are close to the technical proposal on equality, the price is even more important. suppliers 52.212-3 Representations and Certifications Commercial Items “(November 2007). ALT I (APR 2002) A bidder can be complete, paragraph (j) of this provision, when a service which has representations and the annual certification electronically at http://orca.bpn.gov If a bidder does not have the introductions and the annual certification electronically on the website of ORCA, the supplier would be complete paragraphs (b) (i) of this provision. 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions “Commercial Items” (DEC 2007) 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions necessary for the implementation of statutes or Executive Orders “Commercial Items” (MAR 2007) 52203-6 restrictions on sales to subcontractors, the Government (Jul 1995). ALT I (September 2006) 52219 - 4 opinion on the evaluation Prive concerns HUBZone preference for Small Business (July 2005) 52219-8 Utilization of Small Business concerns (MAY 2004) 52219-9 plan Small Business Subcontracting (NOV 2007) Section II (OCT 2001) , 52219-16 Liquidiert damages Subcontracting Plan (JAN 1999), 52219-28 Post Small Business Award Program representation (JUNE 2007), 52222-19 Child Labor-Cooperation with the authorities and solutions bypass (January 2006) 52222-3 Convict Laboratory (JUNE 2003), 52222-19 Child Labor-Cooperation with the authorities and corrective action (AUG 2007) 52222-21 prohibition of Segregated Facilities (FEB 1999). 52222-26 Equal Opportunity (MAR 2007) 52222-35 equal opportunities for disabled people-veterans, veterans of the era of Vietnam, and other eligible veteran (SEP 2006) 52222-36 Affirmative Action for Workers with disabilities (JUNE 1998) 52222-37 employment, the reports on the special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other eligible veteran (SEPTEMBER 2006), 52222-39 Notification of Employee Rights Whether the payment of fees or European Union Charges (DEC 2004), 52222-50 Combat Trafficking in Human Beings (AUG 2007) 52225 -1 Buy American Act-Supplies (JUNE 2003), 52225-13 some restrictions of foreign policy purchases (February 2006) 52232-33 payment by Electronic Funds Transfer Centre-contractors record (October 2003), 52222-41 Service Contract Act (November 2007) 52222 -42 Statement of Equivalent price of the Confederation Hires (MAY 1989), 52222-43 Fair Labor Standards Act and Services Contract prices Adjustment Act (Several years and Option Contracts) (NOV 2006) 52.209-4 approval of the first review article of eGovernment (SEP 1989 52.216-22 Indefinite quantity (OCT 1995) HSAR 3052.209-70 BAN ON CONTRACTS WITH CORPORATE EXPAT (JUNE 2006). (A) The prohibition. Section 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 USC 395, prohibits the Department of Homeland Security underwriting of a contract with another person who is treated as a national capital in the opposite meaning of this clause, or a subsidiary body of a Tel. Secretary waive the prohibition regarding a contract, if the Secretary-General notes that the waiver is in the interest of national security. Definitions (B). As stated in this clause: Expanded-Affiliated group is a group within the meaning of section 1504 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (regardless account of the Section 1504 (b) This Code), unless the article 1504 of this type of code is replaced by “more than 50%” at least 80% “means any ground, it seems to be the case. Business Entity Incorporated is any person who is or for the number (b) Chapter 835 of the Homeland Security Act, 6 USC 395, it will be like a foreign company, for the purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Inverted Domestic Corporation. A service from abroad is treated as a capital national Conversely, when, according to a plan (or series of transactions in the context) - (1) The establishment is the resumption of direct or indirect ” all the essential features of the Directly or indirectly, by a capital nationals or all the essential characteristics of a trade or activity Inländischen partnership, (2) Following the acquisition of at least 80 per cent of shares (by the vote or value) of the company, (i) in the case of a Resuming with the respect of a capital nationals by the former shareholders of domestic demand due to the group’s participation in the National Reserve Corporation , or (ii) in the case of an acquisition for a national partnership, the partners of the former domestic partnership because of the involvement of a capital or profits to the national interest and Partnership ( 3) The expansion of the group, following the acquisition, the company has no major activities in a foreign country where or under the law, the establishment of created or organized, if In comparison with the overall activities of a wider group. person, domestic and foreign, are important, as these terms contained in paragraphs (1), (4), (5) of section 7701 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Respectively. © Special provisions. definitions and rules apply to the question of whether an individual alien should be treated as a capital national umgedrehter. ( 1), some camps for non-compliance. For purposes of treatment of a person other than Umgedrehter a capital nationals who are not considered in determining liability account: (i) members of the group expanded, including the foreign entity, or (ii) the existence of such units, which is sold at a public offer in connection with the acquisition in subsection (b) (1) of section 835 of Homeland Security Act, 6 USC 395 (b) (1). (2) The plan, in some cases. If a foreign person to acquire, directly or indirectly, all the essential characteristics of a society or domestic partnership During the 4 years from the date of 2 years before the date of the liability requirements of Section (b) (2) are met, such actions are treated as after a plan. (3) Certain transfers of non-compliance. transfer of ownership or liabilities (including participation or distribution) are neglected, if such transfers are part of a plan main objective is to prevent the purposes of this section. (D) A rule for Parents partnerships. Aux for the application of Article 835 (b) of the Homeland Security Act, 6 USC 395 (b) for the acquisition of a national partnership, provided that the present rules, all national partners, under joint control ( in the sense of Section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986), shall be considered as a partnership. (E) treatment of certain rights. (1), certain rights are treated as actions to the extent necessary to ensure a fair present value of the interests of all incidents of the transaction follows: (i) are guaranteed, (ii) options, (iii) contracts for the acquisition of stock, (iv) instruments convertible bonds, and (v) d Other similar interests. (2) the rights of the denomination of stocks is not treated, As stocks, whenever it deems necessary to be done to update the value of the transaction or the failure to comply Transactions including recognition of the defeat, with the aim of Article 835 (F), advertising. Bidders under this call for proposals is that [please check]: 0 This is not a foreign person , are treated should be considered as a capital umgedrehter national accordance with the criteria (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 by 3009.104-73, 0 This is a foreign person, which should be treated as a domestic Umgedrehter Society capital, in accordance with the criteria (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 by 3009.104-73, but she filed an application for exemption under 3009 .104-74, was not disputed, or 0, it is d a foreign person, should be treated as a capital national umgedrehter according to criteria (HSAR) 48 CFR 3009.104-70 by 3009.104-73, but he intends to file a request for waiver in accordance with the 3009 .104-74 . (G) A copy of the waiver approved if a waiver was Granted to the waiver request or if an exemption has been requested to bid or proposal. (At the end of the provision) NOTE TO FILING THE AGENCY’S PROTEST. It is the policy of the Coast Guard and answers about procurement in a fair and the weather in an equitable manner. Ombudsman Agency program protests (OPAP), has been charged to investigate matters of agency protest and resolve, without cumbersome and costly trial. OPAP is an independent audit of the authority which is entitled to the issuance of a prevailing plaintiff basically the same as Telles ‘granting discharge General Accounting Office (GAO). Interested parties are invited to try to resolve their problems within the Coast Guard as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), the forum, rather than filing a protest by GAO forums or some external stakeholders can search concerns informal resolution or opt-file formal protest to an agency with the payer officer or mediator. Forum informally with the mediator. Interested parties who believe that the Coast Guard is unfair d Purchasing or otherwise broken firstly their concerns directly to the sender aware of the officer. Contracting If the officer is unable to respond to the concerns of the interested party is invited to become familiar with the mediator Coast Guard Agency for protests. Informal part of this process, the Agency is not necessary to the suspension of procurement. Relying on an informal forum to suspend at any time, not a condition for filing a protest of the agency or with another forum. order to ensure a timely response, interested parties should provide the following information to the Ombudsman Solicitation / Sequence number, Contracting Office, Contracting Officer, and call Closing Date ( if applicable). Agency formal protest with the mediator. Before filing a formal protest Agency, firstly, the demonstrators using their best forces to resolve their concerns with the “contracting officer” by open and frank discussions. If the demonstrators, the concerns are pending an independent audit is in place, the Ombudsman. Expressing This can be a formal protest of the agency contracting officer or as an alternative to what the mediator in the framework of OPAP. Procedure award contract or performance, for the period of protest, unless the awarding of the contract or the service is justified, in writing, of the imperative and urgent, or by writing to the east in the best interest of the government. The agency has set a target of protests in less than 35 calendar days after the date of registration. Protests includes information presented in the document FAR 33,103 (d) (2). If the complainant n has failed to provide any information necessary for the resolution of protest may be delayed or dismissed protests in May. Nevertheless filling the protest Satisfying the demand. For Meanwhile, protests Should within FAR 33,103 (e). Objection formally introduced under the programme should OPAP to the following address: Commander (CG-851) 2100 2nd Street, NW, Room 2606 Washington, DC 20593 Telephone: 202-267-2285 Fax: 202 -267-4011

INTERNET ADDRESS: Made available by http://www.fbo.gov/spg/DHS/USCG/USCGARSC/HSCG38-08-R-200002/listing.html Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. (FIND) 202-429 – 5944

John Nogawski the reins of the CBS Television Distribution.

Nogawski, who recently shared the Division’s President and COO title with Robert Madden, fulfils the role of Roger King, syndication pioneer, died Dec. 8.

Madden, is now on the position of the new Senior Executive vp. He particularly responsible for overseeing the company’s programming partnerships with Sony Pictures Television for “Wheel of Fortune” and “Jeopardy!” And with Harpo Prods. For “The Oprah Winfrey Show.” It is now Nogawski report.

Terry Wood, the chairman of the creative community, from the business and development of a new agreement, as a short time ago, as is the case, it remains in its function of the division, as President Joe DiSalvo of Sales. The two directors are always to the reporting Nogawski.

In his new role as chairman is to oversee Nogawski creator, business and management operations for CBS Corp. ‘national syndication of the company. The Executive Committee, said King CEO of the division, now reports CBS Corp. President and CEO Leslie Moonves.

“John has a resumption of the success in all areas of syndication - first race and off-network programming, as well as distribution and the media,” said Moonves. “He played a central role in the promotion of a path to programming syndication for our owners and increasingly to innovate, create opportunities for revenue through our program of the library of integrated marketing efforts in the digital world. ”

Nogawski and Madden’s President and COO contributions, in September 2006, when the king of the World Prods. In collaboration with CBS Paramount Domestic TV CTD. The new structure of the national television found Nogawski Syndication run all departments sales and distribution and marketing advertisers, research and new media, while Madden won surveillance operations management, finance, right, communication and CBS Consumer Products.

In his new role, is to monitor Nogawski a slate of eight of the top 10 rated syndicated shows. Among the shows distributed CTD are the first-run “Wheel,” “Jeopardy!” “Oprah,” “Entertainment Tonight,” “Judge Judy” and “Dr. Phil” and “off-net series such as” Everybody Loves Raymond “and” CSI “franchise. The Division participates in the opening of another spokesman for the time of day, “doctors” in this case.

Nogawski said no initiatives is also a high priority for the future.

“Other platforms are so important in the future,” he said. “I just want a spend a lot of time getting to know really, and meetings with the leaders of the (sub-) industry partner and with the right people to ensure a successful future.”

At CTD, Nogawski is credited with the creation of revenue, platforms corporate programming. He also integrated a unit sale, as advertising for brands of the first run productions; false digital initiatives of the first and run-off, the network indicates that resulted in partnerships with Yahoo, MSN and Procter & Gamble, and In proceeded to the subdivision of programming online - Web site of the distribution based on the talent competition “Big Shot Live", a partnership with “ET” in Germany affiliated sites.

Before the reorganization, which was founded in 2006, CTD, Nogawski, a long CBS / Paramount executive, the president of CBS Paramount Domestic Television. In this capacity, which it has already, since March 2002, it is for all distribution activities and services of the advertiser Paramount.

Pending Moonves Madden called “one of the highest of good over the forces of the economy in relations with enormous in our industry.” Madden has been a long King World Executive before a central role in society, the merger with CBS as executive vp in January 2000. After the merger, it has a similar letter to CBS Enterprises, at the front of COO in January 2004.

Question: What do you have in your absence during Football mainstream?

Answer: During my sabbatical year, I was back with associations like Highlanders, and other clubs in the first division on issues such as event management, the constitution and the status of players. I have a passion for the game, it was during this period that I discovered is that the needs of Zifa have intensified support programs to associations, especially in the lower divisions and Line-Cours.

During that period I also participated in a course of Fifa in Zurich, Switzerland, and in March, we were the first group with the new Fifa Central. . . It was for regional instructors, Chris Mbanga and visits me.

I have, since, and held in Bulawayo way for the allocation of man with the potential management and group dynamics.

I also managed to become familiar with the structures of the lowest in our industry, and contributed to some of its own clubs appreciate Fifa, Caf and Zifa statutes, the company because in some clubs players have not Only football, but they have work contracts.

This interaction has shown that it is necessary to work harder to build capacity. It was time to betrübend to note that former players are in a situation of extreme poverty, and this reinforces my solution, and try to revitalize the Footballers’ Union of the Republic of Zimbabwe, as well as former footballers ago helped to live a better life.

We really Fifpro and parts of our country and our partners in South Africa and Egypt, and I did in the structures, Shepherd Chiware (Advisor sport) and Desmond Maringwa had begun.

I also emphasized the fact that there are more people dedicated to the outside, support for lower division clubs, whose passion for football should be completed by Zifa and the business community.

Q: But how he feels right now, as the development and training of directors?

A: I just feel that I was part of the family of football and football, that beyond 2010.

I believe we owe our tour, from 2007 to 2010 with more vehemence, and I am sure, with my knowledge and experience, we can spearhead of the growth and development of the national team.

It is a pity that we can not squander two years finger-pointing, but I think I have to act like an eagle flies so high, and do a search on key targets, and I will not be part of the insignificant, that wars Marquent football.

Q: So you regret or bitterness during the period that you have been on the side of the line?

A: No, bitterness.

The only regret is that we allowed the time and energy to focus on quiz at the expense of the party. We must be able to stand up and dust, then down to serious business after the mark of man is not to stay on the cutting edge, but rising again from its ashes and strong.

Our game has been a victim of hatred of the policy of the proximity of several decades, and my approach is that human beings should be a game of chance to flourish because we are a giant of football, which is placed Waiting.

In an odd nomenclature shuffle, UT lawmakers move to ban domestic partnerships, but also officials from Salt Lake City Side-Stepping limitation of the new change of name by the National Registry of their association with the word “mutual commitment” .

The Deseret Morning News reported March 26 in a story www.deseretnews.com/article/1, 5143,695264778,00. Html, the government that the bill prohibiting the use of national registries partnership result of a bill by Republican Senator Chris Buttars state, the controversy generated when he criticizes as part of another bill say school it is like a Afro - American children and called it “a dark, horrible thing.”

Cost Buttars remark that some political capital. However, a Republican colleague, Greg Bill, and to strengthen a revised version of the measure to win, went to its approval by the Senate and the State House.

“Domestic partnership” is a concept widely used in local government, employers and insurance to nominate two persons, whose life in such a way to make their business as interdependent. In general, the term is reserved for same-sex couples, who live together in a stable relationship.

Less often, the term can take two people in connection with the blood (or a parent and child), or in a non-sexual, but a way of life in the long term. Often, the status of national production partnership opens the door to the expansion of the health of an employee reporting and other benefits for the person, as domestic workers partners.

Since 2005, Salt Lake City has a domestic political partnership registry allows people to the city a right of access, to extend the perks of a national partnership - until now. With the government move to ban domestic partnerships, the city government is now trying, a fund dedicated to the life partners, in view of one of the mechanisms for the protection of employees on the ability to expand, of Health, a report on life partners.

Since the Utah Constitution has been amended by voters in the year 2004 to prohibit the promotion of equality of marriage and the recognition of “substantially equivalent” agreement between two persons of the same sex, state legislators have argued that domestic partnerships are a violation of state law.

Last week on this page (NCR, Nov. 7), we completed the Bishop Daniel P. Reilly Worchester, Massachusetts, “because of the issue of gay benefits.” In his testimony on October 23 on the same-sex civil marriage and the Association of bills, “before the legislature, the Board of judiciary, Reilly said: “Some say it is unfair for married couples only offer certain socio - economic benefits. This is another question about the importance of marriage.”

Reilly continued: “Civil Unions Bill to the committee confuses the two issues, changing the meaning of spouse, in order to allow access to all the services of same-sex partners from civil marriage Union. This changes the institution of marriage, with enlargement, Represents esteem, of the law on spouses. Let’s not mix the two issues. We have the issue of the distribution of justice on its own terms. If a law changing the definition of marriage or changes in the meaning of spouse, we can not support. If the goal is a view of the various departments and determine who should be eligible spouses, we will be us for the discussion. ”

Reilly was not quite as fine distinction. A discussion on how the economic benefits of enlargement in the traditional marriage (health insurance, for example), while others (especially because, as part of the testimony, homosexual couples) would be something that would support the ‘Church.

A positive step forward, we thought. Of course, the Church to continue the fight against civil marriage for gay couples, or any other law, sanctioned the scheme (eg, “civil unions"), similar to traditional marriage, but there would be a discussion on promotion of economic and social justice.

But now that the response to Reilly’s comments.

In a press release on October 28 ( “Do not Believe the Headlines"), the Massachusetts Catholic Conference said that “the management of bills of same-sex partnership has not been in Switzerland in front of the episcopal commission Reilly, and no connection with them, in his testimony, or comments after the press. ”

This distinction is also true that, as it is irrelevant. The Massachusetts legislature is considering legislation focuses on the gay couples on a number of fronts, “civil unions", “gay marriage” and “Same-sex partnerships in Switzerland” of them. There are differences in relation to each of these approaches, and it was clear that the bishop of the fact that the Massachusetts church leaders from all three. The Reilly said in his testimony prepared (it was not an “off-the-cuff comment), has interpreted the Church is willing to discuss an acceptable means, in short civil marriage or its equivalent rude,” an end (economic justice) Many on each side of gay marriage.

Another article in the Boston archdiocesan paper, the pilot, said that Reilly’s remarks were “False [the] press release.” On October 30 a letter to the editor of major newspapers Massachusetts, Reilly emphasized the difference between individual rights and socio-economic benefits, which individual rights “and” claims of the rights of research on couples Same-sex because of their homosexual relationship. ”

Maybe the shade is Reilly’s first witness, combined with the emotions around the theme lent itself sometimes exaggerated headlines.

However, the traceability of the church was less artistically Massachusetts and unnecessarily defensive.

We continue to believe that, given the context of the paper version testimony, Reilly gave the title of his testimony, “Woman’s Right to Know, Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Union Bill,” and he withdrew the differences, Pull it is reasonable, it was trying to find a way to learn about the issue of benefits, without going into the question of the change in the meaning of marriage.

And we still believe that rational discourse on a controversial area of public policy, which is not far away and that the major benefits of these two reasons, and reasoned discussion.

Oct. 10 - Vote for Amendment 43? Indeed, marriage is a union between a man and a woman. And married couples may arise, and be held responsible for debt reduction, including the right to benefits, medical decisions and end of the relationship with the ownership of the means of production, for example.

Vote for referendum I. Why? Because of a national production, a partnership is a relationship between same-sex couple. And together national partners and to be held responsible for debt reduction, including the right to benefits, medical decisions and end of the relationship with the ownership of the means of production, for example. Confused? I referendum is the marriage under another name, Bishop Philip Porter of Promise Keepers. “If you vote yes to 43, where we have confidence in the fact that human beings, we believe they should not be a referendum, I vote on what it himself.”

Rev. Steve Brown of Greeley agreement. I referendum, it is the same rights. “This is not about marriage. It is human rights for man, a man who, I believe, in the image of God.” Whatever say supporters on both sides, the voters have the last word on polls in the coming months. And, technically, the two can co-exist in the law changes. * Amendment 43 amends the Colorado Constitution to define marriage between a man and a woman. One argument in favor of passage that, in Massachusetts, a legal definition has not been enough to prevent the courts of the State to recognize same-sex marriages. * I created a new referendum of the legal partnership relationship to the national same-sex couples, offers the possibility of legal provisions and responsibilities of married couples given Colorado. It means that the partnership is not marriage, and therefore does not change the public policy of the country in which the marriage as a union between a man and a woman. In favour of the amendment 43, Porter said: “It is morally just. We were struck by a Creator God the Creator and that marriage between a man and a woman, a man and a woman. Who are we against the mandates are paid by us Created in the wake of the referendum I, Brown said: “There are fundamental rights for the brothers and sisters who are not on them yet … Visit hospital rights, the rights of burial, insurance-parity. To defeat this amendment, it is, discrimination and not to show compassion. ”

DENVER, Sept. 19 (UPI) – A new poll finds that slim majorities of Colorado voters favor legal rights for same-sex couples and oppose gay marriage.

The survey was conducted by the Rocky Mountain News and CBS 4.

Voters get a chance to decide both in November. Referendum I would allow homosexual couples to register as domestic partners, while Amendment 43 bans gay marriage.

The poll found that 58 percent of registered voters support Referendum I, while 52 percent plan to vote for the amendment, which would put a definition of marriage in the state constitution. Generally, those who support one oppose the other, but 20 percent support both.

“The framers of Ref I were very careful and specific,” pollster Lori Weigel told the Rocky Mountain News.

She said they were careful to reassure voters that domestic partnerships would not be marriages.

Jul. 9–John Stolz and John White will celebrate their 30th anniversary together in October.

But the couple from Colts Neck will have a new anniversary in the eyes of New Jersey when they declare their relationship to the state tomorrow.

That’s when a new law goes into effect allowing same-sex couples over the age of 18 and heterosexual couples over the age of 62 to register as domestic partners.

Such couples will be granted inheritance and hospital visitation rights, and gay partners will be eligible for health insurance.

“To me, this is really a wonderful thing that New Jersey is doing as far as civil rights is concerned,” said Stolz, 53.

To mark the occasion, a handful of municipal clerk’s offices statewide – including Asbury Park – will be open tomorrow.

Neptune couple Fran Goldberg, 55, and Harriet Leyden, 62, are planning to register tomorrow morning in Maplewood, Essex County, which is having a huge ceremony and celebration. Neighboring South Orange is scheduled to open at midnight for couples to file.

New Jersey is the fifth state to have such a registry. Gov. McGreevey signed the Domestic Partnership Act in January despite the protests of the New Jersey Catholic Conference and conservative League of American Families.

Critics said the bill treats unmarried heterosexual couples unfairly based on age. The law offers rights only to seniors, who in some cases would have their pension and/or Social Security benefits reduced if they opted for marriage.

The New Jersey branch of AARP, the senior advocacy group, did not take a position on the law and has not received much feedback from its 1.3 million members, according to associate state director Steve Ma.

“We don’t know how it will affect our population,” Ma said.

Its effect on the gay community is also unclear at this point.

As of 2002 there were same-sex couples living together in every county in New Jersey and in 548 of the state’s 566 municipalities, according to the gay rights group Lambda Legal. But not all of them are embracing the new law.

Joe D’Andrea of Asbury Park called it “a good first step” in the fight for equality but said he and his partner, Will Elliott, will not be registering.

“I’m disappointed that the current law only affords couples 10 out of the more than 1,000 benefits of marriage that the federal government has identified,” said D’Andrea, 50.

He also bristles at the fact that domestic partners must provide proof of joint financial responsibility – like a statement from a joint bank account – when such documents aren’t required for a marriage license.

More : accessmylibrary.com

Mar. 28–DENVER - Same-sex partners would be able to get some of the same rights as married couples under a proposed referendum approved by the House on Monday. A bill that would ask voters to create domestic partnerships, which would permit gays and lesbians to inherit each other’s property, operate under the same state tax laws and adopt children just like married couples. The proposal, which now heads off to the Senate, also would require the the gay and lesbian couples to obtain licenses to certify their partnership similar those who get married. “These are not just gay people we’re talking about here, they’re gay Coloradans,” said Rep. Tom Plant, D-Nederland, who introduced HB1344. “They deserve equal treatment.” Democrats said the measure doesn’t allow same-sex couples to get married, but Republicans said it amounts to the same thing. As a result, domestic partnerships not only erode marriages, but Colorado as a whole, the GOP lawmakers said. “This is a significant social change for Colorado, to the concept of marriage,” said Rep. Kevin Lundberg, R-Berthoud. “This is a dark day in Colorado.” Rep. Angie Paccione, D-Fort Collins, said that people said the same thing decades ago about allowing interracial marriages. The nation didn’t fall then and it certainly won’t now, she said. The measure passed virtually along party lines, 38-27, but with three Republicans joining the Democratic majority: Reps. Mark Larson of Cortez, Al White of Winter Park and Bob McCluskey of Fort Collins. “This is not an issue of equity, this is an issue of equitable treatment,” Larson said. “This has nothing to do with morals or religion. The state cannot give benefits to some people while denying it to others. That is quite simply, wrong.” Southern Colorado’s delegation voted with their parties, but it’s too early to say if that will happen when the Senate votes on the measure. While Sen. Abel Tapia, D-Pueblo, said he’s a definite “yes” on the measure and Sen. Greg Brophy, R-Wray, is an emphatic “no,” Republican Sens. Ken Kester of Las Animas and Lewis Entz of Hooper say they haven’t made up their minds. “I might take a real close look at this,” Kester said. “I’m not so sure it’s that bad.”

May 4–DENVER - A proposed referendum that would create domestic partnerships for same-sex couples cleared another major hurdle Wednesday. The Colorado Senate gave its initial approval to a measure that would grant same-sex couples some of the same rights now afforded to married couples, but without it actually being a marriage. But even if the Legislature ultimately gives its final approval to HB1344, it still would face the scrutiny of Colorado voters in November. “In my opinion, this is a fairness and equality issue,” said Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald, D-Golden, who introduced the measure with Rep. Tom Plant, D-Nederland. “It’s giving same-sex couples a unique and special status in the state of Colorado to allow them to enjoy some of the benefits that those of us who are married get to enjoy. Those things are responsibilities as well as benefits.” Fitz-Gerald called the idea “a small step toward equality,” saying it’s all a matter of equal rights. Still, she said it’s not a marriage, in part, because the union would not be recognized outside of the state, or even by the federal government.

The bill does not allow same-sex couples to file taxes as if they were married, and it also doesn’t require any private organization such as churches to recognize them. A legislative analysis of the measure predicts that about 1,500 couples statewide will apply for a domestic partnership license in its first year, and another 3,500 by the second year it is in effect. While the Colorado Domestic Partnership Benefits and Responsibilities Act doesn’t create a new class of marriage, per se, it does allow same-sex couples to do such things they currently are denied, such as inherit each other’s property, visit each other in emergency rooms and adopt children as a couple.

But it’s just those benefits that Republican opponents to the measure don’t like. Sen. Jim Dyer, R-Centennial, said the idea is too close to actually being a marriage, and is bad public policy. “It it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck,” Dyer said. “This is a same-sex marriage bill. You’ve got to get a license for it, you’ve got to go through a divorce. All of the things in here, all of the elements that go into this bill create all of the obligations of a marriage, all of the responsibilities of marriage. We just ought to simply say so. “A lot of us don’t think this is a matter of justice or injustice,” he added. “We’re simply not willing to say the union of people of the same sex is a marriage.” The bill still requires a final vote in the Senate, which could come as early as today. The House approved it in late March.